Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Sand Pit's avatar

Much good thinking here. I agree with almost everything you suggest. I believe the most important move for progressives who understand that the Democrat Party does not represent the needs of working people is to build toward a national agreement on a populist agenda. And what I perceive at this point in time is that the priority of that movement is best served by a focus on demands, not on reshaping the Democrat Party from within. That’s not to say that is not what could happen. But many candidates have falsely cloaked themselves in the mantle of populism. Placing priority on the Dem Party could lead to confusion and disappointment which could weaken the commitment to populism. It’s kind of a “build it and they will come” pragmatism. With events and shifts in the body politic moving so fast, it is not possible to see even 5 years into the future. We have to rip the veil off politicians’ veneer of representing people’s interest, show clearly whose interest politicians serve, and demonstrate how a true populist agenda would manifest through governmental policy and action.

Expand full comment
phelpsmediation's avatar

Well said, “what kind of country takes food out of the mouths of hungry children and health care away from poor people, to make billionaires richer?

Expand full comment
59 more comments...

No posts