Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scott Layden's avatar

I believe what’s missing is a unifying platform of problems, ideas, and solutions to rally round and use as candidate filters. Without North Stars, we’re sailing, but who knows where? Trump is good at grievance but not at solutions. We should create a topic-problem-end-state solution- plan grid for education, national security, health, science, climate, taxation, budgeting, environment, race relations, immigration, campaign finance, etc saying, if you are with us or support us or run for us, this is what we’ll do our best to deliver.

We should have major and minor platform items, such as “we believe and will work for and education system that prepares our youth a retraining to succeed in future work and life endeavors. We should not be elevating fringe topics like pushing biological men competing as women as our lead topics. Beside that’s unfair to biological women.

Iris's avatar

Replied to your email, signed up at the new site, and am reporting for duty, sir.

I understand and support the screening you describe as "not so prescriptive that it ends up being a manifesto." But damn. I'd love to see candidates run not just on "Medicare for All" for example, but something, ANYTHING, more specific, like, "Medicare for All, by lowering the age of access by five years every five years." This would gain (and keep) an enormous and ever-growing slice of the electorate.

Thought re: today's newsletter: Although it's almost certainly not original to me, I've long observed that capitalism *requires* a "permanent underclass." Unless that "underclass" is a temporary status, something akin to a required national service from all members of society, capitalism in its existing forms will always be deeply and irredeemably immoral.

68 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?